Apple’s relationships with Intel and TSMC are complex, with trust being a major factor. According to a report, Intel’s failure to keep pace with Mac chips led Apple to seek an alternative processor supplier, resulting in a solid relationship with TSMC.
The problem with Intel, the report states, is that a lack of trust drove Apple to look elsewhere. This lack of trust was partly due to Intel’s inability to deliver mobile processors when Steve Jobs asked for them.
The History of Apple and Intel
Apple’s A-series chips were initially built for mobile devices and eventually became the M-series Mac chips. Intel’s refusal to make mobile processors for Apple led the company to partner with TSMC, which produced Apple-designed chips.
Apple’s acquisition of chip development expertise from PA Semi also played a role in the company’s move to Apple Silicon. The work Apple did on mobile processors enabled the transition to Apple Silicon.
Current Challenges
Intel’s need for new client wins and the Trump Administration’s push for onshore processor production led to negotiations with Apple. However, Intel’s reluctance to build manufacturing capacity without a supply contract has hindered the process.
Related: Citrix acquires OS‑agnostic Windows app container firm
Apple requires a firm promise of capacity before it can provide trust, which Intel has not been able to offer. This has led to cultural clashes between the two companies, with Intel telling third-party partners that it had secured Apple as a client, despite Apple’s preference for discretion.
TSMC, on the other hand, has a corporate commitment to trust, recognized across the industry. The company invests in developing process technology for future needs, rather than waiting for orders.
Trust and Capacity
While capacity is important, a trusted relationship between companies is also significant. Apple’s history of being let down by competitors has taught the company to value discretion and corporate trust.
In the ultra-competitive market, Apple’s caution can be seen as business sense. The company’s need for additional supply has led it to speak with Intel, Samsung, and other component manufacturers, but trust remains a key factor in these relationships.
As Apple continues to sell its products in large quantities, the company must source additional supply while maintaining its commitment to trust and discretion. This delicate balance will be important for Apple’s future success.
